Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011
Prediction of silent ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamada Kiyofumi, Yoshimura Shinichi, Kawasaki Masanori, Enomoto Yukiko, Takano Kyohei, Asano Takahiko, Minatoguchi Shinya, Iwama Toru
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A major concern with carotid artery stenting (CAS) is the potential for cerebral embolism. The purpose of this study was to determine whether virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) can predict the risk of a silent ischemic lesion after CAS.
METHODS: We performed CAS in 45 patients with carotid stenosis. Before CAS, we assessed plaque characteristics by VH-IVUS. We also performed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after CAS to detect newly appearing ipsilateral silent ischemic lesions (NISIL).
RESULTS: In the patient group that was positive for NISIL (P group: n = 18), the relative fibrofatty (FF) area identified by VH-IVUS in 5 cross-sections including the most stenotic lesion was significantly larger than that in areas of the NISIL-negative group (N group: n = 27; 32.7 ± 13.2 and 18.3 ± 9.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). The relative fibrous area was significantly lower in the P group than in the N group (59.2 ± 9.5 and 74.6 ± 9.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the relative dense calcium and necrotic core areas between the P and N groups. From the analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves, most reliable cutoff values for predicting NISIL were a relative FF area of 30% in the most stenotic lesion. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the relative FF area was an independent predictor of NISIL (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative tissue characterization of atherosclerotic lesions of carotid arteries using VH-IVUS was useful to predict NISIL after CAS. However, the positive predictive value determined by VH-IVUS was not superior to that determined by a noninvasive method.
METHODS: We performed CAS in 45 patients with carotid stenosis. Before CAS, we assessed plaque characteristics by VH-IVUS. We also performed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before and after CAS to detect newly appearing ipsilateral silent ischemic lesions (NISIL).
RESULTS: In the patient group that was positive for NISIL (P group: n = 18), the relative fibrofatty (FF) area identified by VH-IVUS in 5 cross-sections including the most stenotic lesion was significantly larger than that in areas of the NISIL-negative group (N group: n = 27; 32.7 ± 13.2 and 18.3 ± 9.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). The relative fibrous area was significantly lower in the P group than in the N group (59.2 ± 9.5 and 74.6 ± 9.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the relative dense calcium and necrotic core areas between the P and N groups. From the analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves, most reliable cutoff values for predicting NISIL were a relative FF area of 30% in the most stenotic lesion. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the relative FF area was an independent predictor of NISIL (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative tissue characterization of atherosclerotic lesions of carotid arteries using VH-IVUS was useful to predict NISIL after CAS. However, the positive predictive value determined by VH-IVUS was not superior to that determined by a noninvasive method.