World neurosurgery · 2024
Clinical Efficacy of Neuroendoscopy Combined with Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Liang, Lu Xinfeng, Zhang Chenggang, Wang Weidong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in postoperative complications and prognosis between patients treated with neuroendoscopy versus conventional craniotomy surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 107 patients with HICH were included. Among them, 58 underwent neuroendoscopy (Group A), while 49 underwent conventional craniotomy under microscopic guidance (Group B). Intracranial pressure monitoring was applied in both groups. The clinical data, incidence of postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative intracranial pressure values, and rate of favorable prognosis were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: No significant difference in baseline clinical data upon admission was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative intracranial pressure did not differ between the 2 groups (P > 0.05), but the postoperative intracranial pressure in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (P < 0.05). After intervention with the different surgical approaches, Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and a significantly higher rate of favorable prognosis compared with Group B (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendoscopy combined with Intracranial pressure monitoring is a safe and reliable approach for the treatment of HICH that reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and improves the recovery of neurological function after surgery.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 107 patients with HICH were included. Among them, 58 underwent neuroendoscopy (Group A), while 49 underwent conventional craniotomy under microscopic guidance (Group B). Intracranial pressure monitoring was applied in both groups. The clinical data, incidence of postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative intracranial pressure values, and rate of favorable prognosis were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: No significant difference in baseline clinical data upon admission was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative intracranial pressure did not differ between the 2 groups (P > 0.05), but the postoperative intracranial pressure in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (P < 0.05). After intervention with the different surgical approaches, Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and a significantly higher rate of favorable prognosis compared with Group B (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendoscopy combined with Intracranial pressure monitoring is a safe and reliable approach for the treatment of HICH that reduces the incidence of postoperative cerebral infarction and improves the recovery of neurological function after surgery.