DOI 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_423_25
Oral health inequities among children with intellectual disabilities: Findings from special olympics.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Children with intellectual disabilities (IDs) face unique oral health challenges due to cognitive, behavioral, and physical limitations, along with barriers to accessing dental care. Data on their oral health in India remain scarce.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to assess the oral health status and treatment needs of athletes with ID participating in Special Olympics (SO) Bharat in Delhi.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 499 athletes aged 6-17 years during the SO Bharat Health Fest. Oral examinations followed the Special Smiles protocol. Data on brushing, pain, caries, missing/filled teeth, fluorosis, gingival health, and treatment needs were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests for gender differences.
RESULTS
Overall, 88.4% reported brushing once or more daily. Dental pain was reported by 13.9% of participants. Untreated caries affected 61.9% of athletes, with molar decay in 46.9%. Females had significantly higher prevalence of untreated molar caries (53.8% vs. 41.7%; P = 0.006), missing molars (12.4% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.002), and gingival disease (34.6% vs. 25.3%; P = 0.022). Only 5.9% had filled teeth, and 7.5% had sealants. Overall, 9.2% required urgent, and 52.6% required nonurgent treatment.
CONCLUSION
Young athletes with ID demonstrate high unmet dental needs, particularly females, with substantial levels of untreated caries and periodontal problems. Integrating preventive oral health within pediatric and school health programs, strengthening access to specialized dental services, and engaging pediatricians in early screening and referral are essential steps to reduce inequities and improve outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.