Pediatric blood & cancer · 2009
Antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin in patients treated for childhood cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kusuki Shigenori, Hashii Yoshiko, Yoshida Hisao, Takizawa Sachiko, Sato Emiko, Tokimasa Sadao, Ohta Hideaki, Ozono Keiichi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a major cause of infectious morality in neutropenic patients receiving chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Micafungin exhibits broad antifungal activity against both Aspergillus and Candida species. We performed a retrospective study to determine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic micafungin against IFI in pediatric neutropenic patients during chemotherapy or HSCT.
PROCEDURE: Forty patients were given micafungin (3 mg/kg/day) intravenously for neutropenia: 131 patient-cycles (39 patients) after chemotherapy and 15 patient-cycles (14 patients) after HSCT. Median duration of neutropenia and micafungin prophylaxis was 13 and 23 days after chemotherapy and HSCT, respectively.
RESULTS: Treatment success rate, defined as absence of proven, probable, possible, or suspected IFIs, was 93.9% (121/131) and 80.0% (12/15) for chemotherapy and HSCT, respectively. Proven or probable IFI was documented in only one patient after HSCT. No adverse events were observed that could be related to micafungin prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that prophylactic micafungin is well tolerated and may prevent IFIs in pediatric patients with neutropenia receiving chemotherapy or HSCT.
PROCEDURE: Forty patients were given micafungin (3 mg/kg/day) intravenously for neutropenia: 131 patient-cycles (39 patients) after chemotherapy and 15 patient-cycles (14 patients) after HSCT. Median duration of neutropenia and micafungin prophylaxis was 13 and 23 days after chemotherapy and HSCT, respectively.
RESULTS: Treatment success rate, defined as absence of proven, probable, possible, or suspected IFIs, was 93.9% (121/131) and 80.0% (12/15) for chemotherapy and HSCT, respectively. Proven or probable IFI was documented in only one patient after HSCT. No adverse events were observed that could be related to micafungin prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that prophylactic micafungin is well tolerated and may prevent IFIs in pediatric patients with neutropenia receiving chemotherapy or HSCT.