Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
The water load test in school children and adolescents with functional gastrointestinal disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peralta-Palmezano Juan Javier, Guerrero-Lozano Rafael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We hypothesize that patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) drink less water volume than healthy subjects during water load test. We evaluated and compared the water load test in students with and without FGID using the Rome III questionnaire.
METHODS: We performed the water load test in 142 students from two schools in Colombia. Students were diagnosed using the Spanish version of the Rome III questionnaire. Students drank water ad libitum for 3 min or until pain, satiety, or vomiting occurred. We correlated anthropometric variables with water volumes drunk. We recorded symptoms like pain and nausea, before and after the water load test.
RESULTS: We evaluated 142 students, with a mean age of 12.1 ± 0.2 years and 59.9% girls. Mean water volume drunk was 459 ± 22 mL. There was no significant difference between water volume drunk by students with and without FGID (466 ± 36 vs. 453 ± 27 mL, p = 0.108). We found a significant correlation between water volume drunk and gender, age, weight, height, and body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Students with and without FGID ingest similar volumes of water. Test adverse effects are minimal, and the test is safe to perform and well tolerated.
METHODS: We performed the water load test in 142 students from two schools in Colombia. Students were diagnosed using the Spanish version of the Rome III questionnaire. Students drank water ad libitum for 3 min or until pain, satiety, or vomiting occurred. We correlated anthropometric variables with water volumes drunk. We recorded symptoms like pain and nausea, before and after the water load test.
RESULTS: We evaluated 142 students, with a mean age of 12.1 ± 0.2 years and 59.9% girls. Mean water volume drunk was 459 ± 22 mL. There was no significant difference between water volume drunk by students with and without FGID (466 ± 36 vs. 453 ± 27 mL, p = 0.108). We found a significant correlation between water volume drunk and gender, age, weight, height, and body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Students with and without FGID ingest similar volumes of water. Test adverse effects are minimal, and the test is safe to perform and well tolerated.