AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 1993
Delayed leaks and fistulas after esophagogastrectomy: radiologic evaluation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anbari M M, Levine M S, Cohen R B, Rubesin S E, Laufer I, Rosato E F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Although breakdown of the esophagogastric anastomosis often occurs as a complication of esophagogastrectomy during the early postoperative period, it is not well recognized that anastomotic leaks and fistulas may occur during the late postoperative period (more than 1 month after surgery). The purpose of our study was to determine the radiologic appearance and clinical significance of these late leaks and fistulas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of radiology records at our hospital from 1985 to 1991 revealed 37 patients who had upper gastrointestinal contrast studies an average of 13.3 months after esophagogastrectomy.
RESULTS: Six patients (16%) had anastomotic leaks or fistulas that occurred during the late postoperative period. Four patients were asymptomatic; three had contrast studies that showed thin, blind-ending tracks extending from the anastomosis into the mediastinum, and the fourth had an esophagogastric fistula. One of the blind-ending tracks later progressed to a gastropleural fistula that was treated with antibiotics and drainage. One symptomatic patient had a gastropleural fistula, and the other had a gastrobronchial fistula. Both fistulas were surgically repaired. None of the leaks or fistulas was associated with recurrent tumor.
CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leaks or fistulas may be detected on contrast studies obtained more than 1 month after esophagogastrectomy. Some leaks appear as blind-ending tracks that have no clinical significance, but others may be manifested by life-threatening gastropleural or gastrobronchial fistulas that necessitate surgical intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of radiology records at our hospital from 1985 to 1991 revealed 37 patients who had upper gastrointestinal contrast studies an average of 13.3 months after esophagogastrectomy.
RESULTS: Six patients (16%) had anastomotic leaks or fistulas that occurred during the late postoperative period. Four patients were asymptomatic; three had contrast studies that showed thin, blind-ending tracks extending from the anastomosis into the mediastinum, and the fourth had an esophagogastric fistula. One of the blind-ending tracks later progressed to a gastropleural fistula that was treated with antibiotics and drainage. One symptomatic patient had a gastropleural fistula, and the other had a gastrobronchial fistula. Both fistulas were surgically repaired. None of the leaks or fistulas was associated with recurrent tumor.
CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leaks or fistulas may be detected on contrast studies obtained more than 1 month after esophagogastrectomy. Some leaks appear as blind-ending tracks that have no clinical significance, but others may be manifested by life-threatening gastropleural or gastrobronchial fistulas that necessitate surgical intervention.