Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2020
Application of EASL 2017 criteria for switching hepatitis B patients from tenofovir disoproxil to entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roade Luisa, Loglio Alessandro, Borghi Marta, Riveiro-Barciela Mar, Soffredini Roberta, Facchetti Floriana, di Paolo Dhanai, Tabernero David, Lunghi Giovanna, Esteban Rafael, Buti Maria, Lampertico Pietro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To overcome safety limitations of tenofovir-disoproxil, EASL guidelines proposed switching chronic hepatitis B patients older than 60 years or with bone or renal disease to tenofovir-alafenamide or entecavir.
AIMS: To estimate the number of patients who would benefit from a treatment switch in a real-life setting.
METHODS: Consecutive hepatitis B patients receiving tenofovir-disoproxil before 31 December 2017 were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in two European hospitals. Clinical and virological data were recorded; renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtrate rate, serum phosphate and creatinine, proteinuria, and albuminuria; bone involvement by spine and femur DEXA scan.
RESULTS: In total, 565 patients included: 62 (18-91) years, 75% males, 92% Caucasian, 92% HBeAg-negative, 40% cirrhotic. Fifty-five percent of patients fulfilled age criterion (>60 years). Older patients had higher rates of cirrhosis (51% vs 26%, p<0.001), cardiovascular disease, and renal impairment. Thirty-six percent of patients met renal criteria, more commonly NA-experienced individuals (35% vs 21%, p=0.001); 17% had bone disease. Overall, 66% of patients had at least one criterion (71% if NA-experienced), 8% all three criteria, 28% age and renal criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of patients receiving long-term tenofovir-disoproxil are candidates for an entecavir or tenofovir-alafenamide switch according to EASL recommendations.
AIMS: To estimate the number of patients who would benefit from a treatment switch in a real-life setting.
METHODS: Consecutive hepatitis B patients receiving tenofovir-disoproxil before 31 December 2017 were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in two European hospitals. Clinical and virological data were recorded; renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtrate rate, serum phosphate and creatinine, proteinuria, and albuminuria; bone involvement by spine and femur DEXA scan.
RESULTS: In total, 565 patients included: 62 (18-91) years, 75% males, 92% Caucasian, 92% HBeAg-negative, 40% cirrhotic. Fifty-five percent of patients fulfilled age criterion (>60 years). Older patients had higher rates of cirrhosis (51% vs 26%, p<0.001), cardiovascular disease, and renal impairment. Thirty-six percent of patients met renal criteria, more commonly NA-experienced individuals (35% vs 21%, p=0.001); 17% had bone disease. Overall, 66% of patients had at least one criterion (71% if NA-experienced), 8% all three criteria, 28% age and renal criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of patients receiving long-term tenofovir-disoproxil are candidates for an entecavir or tenofovir-alafenamide switch according to EASL recommendations.