The International journal of artificial organs · 2003
Continuous renal replacement therapy: does technique influence electrolyte and bicarbonate control?
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morimatsu H, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Ronco C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Different techniques of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) might have different effects on electrolyte and acid-base control. The aim of this study was to determine whether continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) or continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) achieve better control of serum sodium, potassium and bicarbonate concentrations.
DESIGN: Retrospective controlled study.
SETTING: Two tertiary intensive care units.
PATIENTS: Critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) treated with CVVHDF (n=49) or CVVH (n=50).
INTERVENTIONS: Retrieval of daily morning sodium and potassium values and arterial bicarbonate levels from computerized biochemical records before and after the initiation of CRRT for up to 2 weeks of treatment. Statistical comparison of findings.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Before treatment, abnormal (high or low) values were frequently observed for sodium (65.1% for CVVHDF vs. 80.0% for CVVH; NS), potassium (45.9% vs. 34.0%; NS), and bicarbonate (73.3% vs. 68.0%; NS). After treatment, however, CVVHDF was more likely to achieve serum sodium concentrations within the normal range (74.1% vs. 62.9%; p=0.0026). Both treatments decreased the mean serum potassium concentration over the first 48 h (p=0.0059 and p<0.0001, respectively), but there was no difference in terms of the normalization of serum potassium concentration during the entire treatment period (88.3% vs. 90.5%; NS). Both treatments increased the mean arterial bicarbonate concentration over the first 48 hours (p=0.011 and p<0.0001, respectively). However, CVVH was associated with a lower incidence of metabolic acidosis (13.8% for CVVH vs. 34.5% for CVVHDF; p<0.0001) and a higher incidence of metabolic alkalosis (38.9% vs. 1.1%; p<0.0001) during the entire treatment period.
CONCLUSIONS: CRRT strategies based on different techniques have a significantly different impact on sodium and bicarbonate control.
DESIGN: Retrospective controlled study.
SETTING: Two tertiary intensive care units.
PATIENTS: Critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) treated with CVVHDF (n=49) or CVVH (n=50).
INTERVENTIONS: Retrieval of daily morning sodium and potassium values and arterial bicarbonate levels from computerized biochemical records before and after the initiation of CRRT for up to 2 weeks of treatment. Statistical comparison of findings.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Before treatment, abnormal (high or low) values were frequently observed for sodium (65.1% for CVVHDF vs. 80.0% for CVVH; NS), potassium (45.9% vs. 34.0%; NS), and bicarbonate (73.3% vs. 68.0%; NS). After treatment, however, CVVHDF was more likely to achieve serum sodium concentrations within the normal range (74.1% vs. 62.9%; p=0.0026). Both treatments decreased the mean serum potassium concentration over the first 48 h (p=0.0059 and p<0.0001, respectively), but there was no difference in terms of the normalization of serum potassium concentration during the entire treatment period (88.3% vs. 90.5%; NS). Both treatments increased the mean arterial bicarbonate concentration over the first 48 hours (p=0.011 and p<0.0001, respectively). However, CVVH was associated with a lower incidence of metabolic acidosis (13.8% for CVVH vs. 34.5% for CVVHDF; p<0.0001) and a higher incidence of metabolic alkalosis (38.9% vs. 1.1%; p<0.0001) during the entire treatment period.
CONCLUSIONS: CRRT strategies based on different techniques have a significantly different impact on sodium and bicarbonate control.