MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e31829ad549

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2013

Traumatic lysis of the inferior rectus muscle.

Zhang Wenxiong, Huang Zhiqing, Yan Jianhua

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The study aims to report a rare case of traumatic lysis of inferior rectus muscle after a traffic accident.

METHODS

This is a case report wherein the clinical features, computed tomographic findings, and surgical treatment were presented.

RESULTS

A 42-year-old woman complained of double vision and upward deviation of the left eye for 13 months after being involved in a traffic accident. The alternate prism and cover test both at distance and near testing showed an exotropia of 18 prism diopters (PD) and hypertropia of 50 PD of the left eye. The left eye had complete restriction of downward movement, and the forced duction test was negative. Computed tomography disclosed that the middle portion of the left inferior rectus muscle was absent. Diagnosis was traumatic lysis of left inferior rectus muscle. The deviation of the left eye was corrected by left superior rectus muscle recession and partial transposition of the medial and lateral rectus muscles. Six months after surgery, no deviation at the primary position both at distance and near testing was present; however, the left eye remained at a -3 restriction of downward movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Paralysis of the inferior rectus muscle may have resulted from the traumatic lysis, a rare clinical feature that can be confirmed by computed tomography.

Для цитирования: Zhang Wenxiong, Huang Zhiqing, Yan Jianhua. Traumatic lysis of the inferior rectus muscle.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31829ad549.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.