MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09273972.2013.786743

Медицинская библиотека · Strabismus · 2013

Binocular vision outcomes following surgery for long-standing large angle exodeviation.

Gill Lindsay K, Arnoldi Kyle

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

One goal of pre-operative sensorimotor testing is to determine fusion potential. Potential for recovery of binocularity following surgical repair of strabismus is inversely correlated to duration of misalignment. The purpose of this study was to determine binocular vision outcomes in long-standing, large-angle, constant exotropia, when the pre-operative sensorimotor exam predicts poor sensory outcome.

METHODS

Patients with constant exotropia >35Δ, present for ≥20 years, and scheduled to undergo strabismus surgery were recruited. Subjects were sorted into 3 groups based on pre-operative sensorimotor results. Group A had evidence of fusion pre-operatively, Group B demonstrated suppression on all tests, and Group C demonstrated paradoxical diplopia on at least one test.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included: 11 in Group A, 5 in Group B, and 4 in Group C. Binocular vision was regained following surgery by 100% in Group A, 80% in Group B, and 50% in group C.

CONCLUSION

Surgical realignment leads to improvements in binocular vision in most patients, even in the case of very long-standing, large, constant deviations. The presence of paradoxical diplopia or dense suppression pre-operatively does not preclude a good sensory outcome.

Для цитирования: Gill Lindsay K, Arnoldi Kyle. Binocular vision outcomes following surgery for long-standing large angle exodeviation.. Strabismus. 2013. DOI: 10.3109/09273972.2013.786743.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.