Acta chirurgica Belgica · 2018
Low Hartmann's procedure or intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection in the primary treatment of low rectal cancer; a survey among surgeons evaluating current practice.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Westerduin Emma, Westerterp Marinke, Bemelman Willem A, Tanis Pieter J, van Geloven Anna A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Low Hartmann's procedure (LHP) and intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection (iAPR) are both surgical options in the treatment of distal rectal cancer when there is no intention to restore bowel continuity. This study aimed to evaluate current practice among members of the Dutch Association of Coloproctology (WCP).
METHODS: An online survey among members of the WCP who represent 66 Dutch hospitals was conducted. The survey consisted of 15 questions addressing indications for surgical procedures and complications.
RESULTS: Surgeons from 37 hospitals (56%) responded. Thirty-six percent does not distinguish low from high Hartmann's procedures based on estimated length of the rectal remnant. Overall, iAPR was the preferred technique in 86%. If asking whether operative approach would be different in tumours at 1 cm from the pelvic floor compared to 5 cm distance, 62% stated that they would consider a different technique. The incidence of pelvic abscess after LHP was thought to be higher, equal or lower than iAPR in 36%, 36% and 21%, respectively, with the remaining respondents not answering this question.
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of the respondents considers iAPR as the preferred non-restorative procedure for rectal cancer not invading the sphincter complex, which contradicts with population based data from 2011.
METHODS: An online survey among members of the WCP who represent 66 Dutch hospitals was conducted. The survey consisted of 15 questions addressing indications for surgical procedures and complications.
RESULTS: Surgeons from 37 hospitals (56%) responded. Thirty-six percent does not distinguish low from high Hartmann's procedures based on estimated length of the rectal remnant. Overall, iAPR was the preferred technique in 86%. If asking whether operative approach would be different in tumours at 1 cm from the pelvic floor compared to 5 cm distance, 62% stated that they would consider a different technique. The incidence of pelvic abscess after LHP was thought to be higher, equal or lower than iAPR in 36%, 36% and 21%, respectively, with the remaining respondents not answering this question.
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of the respondents considers iAPR as the preferred non-restorative procedure for rectal cancer not invading the sphincter complex, which contradicts with population based data from 2011.