World neurosurgery · 2017
The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean Neurosurgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cao YiYao, Pu Ke, Li Guodong, Yan XueJiang, Ma Yue, Xue Kai, Sun ZhiMing, Li QingGuo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) and the risk factors for postoperative infections in clean neurosurgery.
METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on all patients who had undergone clean neurosurgical operation at our institution between January 2009 and December 2014. From January 2009 until October 2011, AP was administered to every clean neurosurgical patient. From November 2011 to December 2014, no AP (n-AP) was prescribed for all clean neurosurgical operations. The efficacy of AP and independent risk factors for infection were studied.
RESULTS: A total of 808 clean neurosurgical cases were included. The AP group comprised 360 surgical cases, including 29 meningitis cases and 2 cases of incision infections, whereas the n-AP group consisted of 448 surgical cases, including 35 meningitis cases and 4 cases of incision infections (P = 0.848). Microorganisms were identified in 7 of 29 cases in the AP group compared with their identification in 22 of 35 cases in the n-AP group (P = 0.002). The percentage of patients with multidrug-resistant bacterial meningitis in the AP group was 57.1% compared with 13.6% in the n-AP group (P = 0.038). The risk factors for postoperative infection were cerebrospinal fluid leakage (odds ratio, 27.8; 95% confidence interval, 9.38-28.55) and surgery time (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in our data set, AP had no preventive effect on postoperative infections in clean neurosurgery. In addition, AP appeared to decrease the positive bacterial culture rate and to promote the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and surgery time were the risk factors for postoperative infection.
METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected on all patients who had undergone clean neurosurgical operation at our institution between January 2009 and December 2014. From January 2009 until October 2011, AP was administered to every clean neurosurgical patient. From November 2011 to December 2014, no AP (n-AP) was prescribed for all clean neurosurgical operations. The efficacy of AP and independent risk factors for infection were studied.
RESULTS: A total of 808 clean neurosurgical cases were included. The AP group comprised 360 surgical cases, including 29 meningitis cases and 2 cases of incision infections, whereas the n-AP group consisted of 448 surgical cases, including 35 meningitis cases and 4 cases of incision infections (P = 0.848). Microorganisms were identified in 7 of 29 cases in the AP group compared with their identification in 22 of 35 cases in the n-AP group (P = 0.002). The percentage of patients with multidrug-resistant bacterial meningitis in the AP group was 57.1% compared with 13.6% in the n-AP group (P = 0.038). The risk factors for postoperative infection were cerebrospinal fluid leakage (odds ratio, 27.8; 95% confidence interval, 9.38-28.55) and surgery time (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in our data set, AP had no preventive effect on postoperative infections in clean neurosurgery. In addition, AP appeared to decrease the positive bacterial culture rate and to promote the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and surgery time were the risk factors for postoperative infection.