Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica · 2000
Comparative studies on pattern VECP between patients with ischemic optic neuropathy and optic neuritis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takasoh M, Mizota A, Adachi-Usami E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether and how VECPs are useful in differentiating ION from ON.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 27 patients with non-arteritic ION and 69 patients with ON using pattern visually evoked cortical potentials (PVECPs) to 3 rev/sec stimulation (transient) and 12 rev/sec stimulation (steady-state).
RESULTS: In patients with ION, non-recordable responses were found in 25% of those with transient VECP and in 74% of those with steady-state VECP. In ON patients, non-recordable responses were found in 34% of those with transient VECP and in 64% of those with steady-state VECP. The average peak latency of P100 component in those with ION was significantly shorter than in those with ON. The amplitude ratio (affected eye/fellow eye) of steady-state VECP was significantly higher in those with ION than in those with ON. The amplitude ratio of P100 showed no significant differences between groups.
CONCLUSION: The P100 peak latency of transient VECPs and the amplitude of steady-state VECPs have the potential to differentiate between ION and ON.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 27 patients with non-arteritic ION and 69 patients with ON using pattern visually evoked cortical potentials (PVECPs) to 3 rev/sec stimulation (transient) and 12 rev/sec stimulation (steady-state).
RESULTS: In patients with ION, non-recordable responses were found in 25% of those with transient VECP and in 74% of those with steady-state VECP. In ON patients, non-recordable responses were found in 34% of those with transient VECP and in 64% of those with steady-state VECP. The average peak latency of P100 component in those with ION was significantly shorter than in those with ON. The amplitude ratio (affected eye/fellow eye) of steady-state VECP was significantly higher in those with ION than in those with ON. The amplitude ratio of P100 showed no significant differences between groups.
CONCLUSION: The P100 peak latency of transient VECPs and the amplitude of steady-state VECPs have the potential to differentiate between ION and ON.