GLP-1s Versus DPP-4s and Risk of Dementia in Patients Requiring Hemodialysis: A Target Trial Emulation Study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists (GLP-1s) compared with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4s) are associated with reduced risk of dementia in the general population with diabetes, but whether this association is true for patients requiring hemodialysis is unknown.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS
Using the U.S. Renal Data System and Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims data from 2011 to 2021, we used the active comparator, new-user design to evaluate incident dementia comparing GLP-1s versus DPP-4s among individuals with both diabetes and hemodialysis dependence. We used inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics and Fine-Gray models to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) accounting for competing risks of death and kidney transplantation. We estimated intention-to-treat and as-treated effects.
RESULTS
We identified 3,619 GLP-1 users and 11,502 DPP-4 users. After IPTW, the average individual was 63 years old, 63% were White, and mean BMI was 31 kg/m2. The median (interquartile interval) follow-up was 1.5 (0.6-2.9) years, and 2,014 patients received a dementia diagnosis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the IPTW-sHR for dementia was 0.82 (95% CI 0.67-0.98), and after 2 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of dementia was 10.2% on GLP-1s vs 11.2% on DPP-4s. As-treated and subgroup analyses were consistent. GLP-1s were also associated with an increased risk of ketoacidosis (sHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.14-2.02; 2-year cumulative incidence: 3.1% vs. 2.2%).
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with diabetes requiring hemodialysis, GLP-1s (vs. DPP-4s) may be a promising therapy to reduce the risk of dementia.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.