DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.12.022
Comparison of panic disorder with and without comorbid major depression by using brain structural magnetic resonance imaging.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Strong lifetime and current comorbidity occur between panic disorder and depression. However, no study has examined the influence of comorbid depression on brain structural characteristics in panic disorder patients. We aimed to compare gray matter (GM) volume and white matter (WM) connectivity in panic disorder patients with and without depression.
METHODS
Twenty-one panic disorder patients without comorbid major depression (PD-D) and seventeen panic disorder patients with major depression (PD+D) were investigated. The Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were assessed for all subjects. Voxel Based Morphometry 5 toolbox and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics were used.
RESULTS
Compared to the PD-D group, GM volumes of patients with PD+D were significantly increased in a cluster located across the left cingulate gyrus, right medial frontal gyrus, and left paracentral lobule. Clinical symptom severity such as PDSS and BDI scores showed positive correlation with GM volumes in the PD+D group. Of the highlighted regions, the left posterior cingulate gyrus demonstrated both a GM volume difference between the groups and a positive correlation of GM volume with symptom severity in the PD+D group. Fractional anisotropy values were significantly higher across almost all the WM tracts in the PD+D group compared to the PD-D group.
CONCLUSION
Alteration of GM volume and WM connectivity was associated with comorbid depression in panic disorder patients in this study. These findings suggest that distinct structural characteristics may be related to comorbid depression occurring in the context of panic disorder.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.