Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2008
Endovascular versus open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: a comparative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zerbib P, Lebuffe G, Sergent-Baudson G, Chamatan A, Massouille D, Lions C, Chambon J P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous angioplasty and open revascularization for chronic intestinal ischemia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous angioplasty (n = 14) or open revascularization (n = 15) for chronic intestinal ischemia were prospectively studied from 2000 to 2006. All patients were symptomatic with at least thrombosis or 80% stenosis of superior mesenteric artery.
RESULTS: No patient was lost to follow-up. Patients were older in percutaneous angioplasty than in the open revascularization group (p = 0.0009). Open revascularization allowed to revascularize more vessels (1.4 versus 1, p = 0.01). There was no difference between groups regarding major complications, mortality, hospital length of stay, and symptomatic recurrence. Primary re-stenosis was only observed in three patients (21.4%) in the percutaneous angioplasty group. Survival at 2 years estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 58% in the percutaneous angioplasty group and 70% in the open revascularization group (p = NS).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous angioplasty should be preferentially offered to older patients and those unable to undergo open revascularization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous angioplasty (n = 14) or open revascularization (n = 15) for chronic intestinal ischemia were prospectively studied from 2000 to 2006. All patients were symptomatic with at least thrombosis or 80% stenosis of superior mesenteric artery.
RESULTS: No patient was lost to follow-up. Patients were older in percutaneous angioplasty than in the open revascularization group (p = 0.0009). Open revascularization allowed to revascularize more vessels (1.4 versus 1, p = 0.01). There was no difference between groups regarding major complications, mortality, hospital length of stay, and symptomatic recurrence. Primary re-stenosis was only observed in three patients (21.4%) in the percutaneous angioplasty group. Survival at 2 years estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 58% in the percutaneous angioplasty group and 70% in the open revascularization group (p = NS).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous angioplasty should be preferentially offered to older patients and those unable to undergo open revascularization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, BalloonBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationChronic DiseaseComorbidityFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntestinesIschemiaKaplan-Meier EstimateLength of StayMaleMesenteric Vascular OcclusionMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionWeight Gain