Travel medicine and infectious disease · 2020
Schistosoma serology after praziquantel treatment of Schistosoma infection in refugee children resettled in Australia: A retrospective analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Volkman Thomas, Clifford Vanessa, Paxton Georgia A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to document changes in serological response before and after treatment of Schistosoma infection in resettled refugee children from endemic countries in Australia. Current Australian guidelines recommend serological screening for Schistosoma infection in children and adults from endemic countries. Data on the utility of follow-up serology after treatment is limited.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective audit of Schistosoma serology in refugee-background children presenting to a specialist paediatric refugee health clinic in Melbourne, Australia, between January 2005 and December 2014. Patients were included with positive Schistosoma serology, documented treatment with praziquantel; clinical and serological followup data after treatment, and no return to endemic areas.
RESULTS: Fifty-one refugee-background children were included. Overall, 40/51 (78.4%) children had serology that decreased after treatment, 25/51 (49.0%) had a greater than twofold decrease and 22/51 (43.1%) reverted to negative serology. Six (11.8%) children showed an increasing serology titre and 5/51 (9.8%) had unchanged serology after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study describing the changes in Schistosoma serological titres following treatment in immigrant children in a non-endemic country. We observed a majority downward trend in antibody titres after praziquantel treatment, suggesting follow-up serological testing may be useful in children to monitor treatment response.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective audit of Schistosoma serology in refugee-background children presenting to a specialist paediatric refugee health clinic in Melbourne, Australia, between January 2005 and December 2014. Patients were included with positive Schistosoma serology, documented treatment with praziquantel; clinical and serological followup data after treatment, and no return to endemic areas.
RESULTS: Fifty-one refugee-background children were included. Overall, 40/51 (78.4%) children had serology that decreased after treatment, 25/51 (49.0%) had a greater than twofold decrease and 22/51 (43.1%) reverted to negative serology. Six (11.8%) children showed an increasing serology titre and 5/51 (9.8%) had unchanged serology after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study describing the changes in Schistosoma serological titres following treatment in immigrant children in a non-endemic country. We observed a majority downward trend in antibody titres after praziquantel treatment, suggesting follow-up serological testing may be useful in children to monitor treatment response.