MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology · 2006

[Prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens in Beijing patients with allergic rhinitis].

Wang Chengshuo, Zhang Luo, Han Demin, Zhou Bing, Zhao Yan, Wang Xiangdong

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine which aeroallergens were prevalent in patients with allergic rhinitis in Beijing.

METHOD: A total of 554 cases (female: 212, male: 342, aged between 4-69 years) who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis by history and clinical presentation, underwent a skin prick test with 20 standardized aeroallergens, and the important sensitizing allergens were assessed. The samples were stratified on two age groups: 4-18-year-olds (children group, n = 81) and 19-60-year-olds (adults group, n = 401). Difference of SPT responses of the two groups was investigated.

RESULT: The percent of patients with positive skin tests were follow:D. farinae (64.6%), D. pteronyssinus (64.3%), Flowers pollen (28.7%), Herbs (26.5%), Lamb's Quarters (13.7%) ,Tree II (13.5%), Giant Ragweed (12.5%). Tree I (12.5%) There were significantly higher sensitivity to dust mite among children group compared to adults group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that the dust mite, Flowers pollen and Herbs are the most important three aeroallergens in Beijing region.

Для цитирования: Wang Chengshuo, Zhang Luo, Han Demin, Zhou Bing, Zhao Yan, Wang Xiangdong. [Prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens in Beijing patients with allergic rhinitis].. Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.