Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie · 1998
[Late morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer: is partial esophagectomy preferred?].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Labbé F, Pradère B, Tap G, Bloom E, Gouzi J L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to report late postoperative complications occurring after oesophagectomy for cancer over a 12-month period and to compare the incidence of these complications according to the level of the anastomosis.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: This study included 106 consecutive patients 51% with subtotal oesophagectomy (thoracic anastomosis), and 49% with total oesophagectomy (cervical anastomosis). The two groups were comparable for age, mean weight loss before surgery, life expectancy, number of positive margins, TNM grading, size and tumour differentiation.
RESULTS: Late morbidity concerned 67.9% of the 106 patients. Predominant complications were dysphagia (32.1% of the 106), gastro-esophageal reflux (25.5% of the 106), and diarrhoea (18.8% of the 106). Among all the factors causing dysphagia, evaluated by logistic regression, the level of anastomosis was only found significant with a 20.4% occurrence for thoracic anastomosis and 44.2% for cervical anastomosis (P = 0.012). All the other complications were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Functional results of oesophagectomy for cancer are poor. As partial oesophagectomy morbidity is lower, total oesophagectomy should not be proposed in all cases of oesophageal cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: This study included 106 consecutive patients 51% with subtotal oesophagectomy (thoracic anastomosis), and 49% with total oesophagectomy (cervical anastomosis). The two groups were comparable for age, mean weight loss before surgery, life expectancy, number of positive margins, TNM grading, size and tumour differentiation.
RESULTS: Late morbidity concerned 67.9% of the 106 patients. Predominant complications were dysphagia (32.1% of the 106), gastro-esophageal reflux (25.5% of the 106), and diarrhoea (18.8% of the 106). Among all the factors causing dysphagia, evaluated by logistic regression, the level of anastomosis was only found significant with a 20.4% occurrence for thoracic anastomosis and 44.2% for cervical anastomosis (P = 0.012). All the other complications were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Functional results of oesophagectomy for cancer are poor. As partial oesophagectomy morbidity is lower, total oesophagectomy should not be proposed in all cases of oesophageal cancer.