NeuroImage. Clinical · 2025
Towards precision functional brain network mapping in Parkinson's disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chernicky Jacob, Dworetsky Ally, Grossen Sarah, Carr Emma, Eid Abdulmunaim, Campbell Meghan C, Gratton Caterina
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative condition that leads to widespread disruption of large-scale brain networks and is further complicated by substantial individual variability in symptomology, progression rates, and treatment response. Consequently, the investigation of individual differences in networks measured via resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) may provide insight. However, most RSFC studies are unable to identify interindividual differences due to poor reliability and group average network definitions. "Precision" RSFC addresses these shortcomings through extended data collection, strict denoising, and individual network definition, but remains untested in PD.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of precision RSFC studies in PD.
METHODS: We collected > 100 min of RSFC data from 20 PD and 10 healthy control participants. We evaluated the level of motion, reliability and stability of RSFC measures in each participant, as well as compared to a conventional 5 min of RSFC data. These measures were benchmarked against HC to evaluate comparability. In addition, we created individualized brain network measures in PD participants to establish feasibility in this population.
RESULTS: Using precision RSFC methods, the PD group produced reliable and stable measures of brain networks that were comparable in quality to healthy controls and substantially exceeded those derived from conventional approaches (whole-brain reliability: 5 min. r = 0.60 ± 0.06, 40 min. r = 0.88 ± 0.04; within-person stability: 5 min. r = 0.40 ± 0.08, 25 min. r = 0.68 ± 0.07; ps < 0.001). Individualized network maps in people with PD captured variation both from group-averaged templates and between individuals, including within motor-related networks.
CONCLUSION: Precision RSFC is feasible and reliable in individuals with PD. This approach holds promise for advancing personalized diagnostics and identifying brain-based biomarkers underlying clinical variability in PD.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and reliability of precision RSFC studies in PD.
METHODS: We collected > 100 min of RSFC data from 20 PD and 10 healthy control participants. We evaluated the level of motion, reliability and stability of RSFC measures in each participant, as well as compared to a conventional 5 min of RSFC data. These measures were benchmarked against HC to evaluate comparability. In addition, we created individualized brain network measures in PD participants to establish feasibility in this population.
RESULTS: Using precision RSFC methods, the PD group produced reliable and stable measures of brain networks that were comparable in quality to healthy controls and substantially exceeded those derived from conventional approaches (whole-brain reliability: 5 min. r = 0.60 ± 0.06, 40 min. r = 0.88 ± 0.04; within-person stability: 5 min. r = 0.40 ± 0.08, 25 min. r = 0.68 ± 0.07; ps < 0.001). Individualized network maps in people with PD captured variation both from group-averaged templates and between individuals, including within motor-related networks.
CONCLUSION: Precision RSFC is feasible and reliable in individuals with PD. This approach holds promise for advancing personalized diagnostics and identifying brain-based biomarkers underlying clinical variability in PD.