MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1071599

Медицинская библиотека · Neuropediatrics · 1994

Analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein in the cerebrospinal fluid of children investigated for encephalopathy.

Ehlers S, Kyllerman M, Rosengren L

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The clinical application of a newly developed highly sensitive ELISA method (20) to assay glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was investigated in children and adolescents with neurological disorders. GFAP analysis was explored as a tool to differentiate disorders with ongoing astrocytosis. A consecutive series of 34 subjects, 17 boys and 17 girls, with nonprogressive and progressive neurological encephalopathies was compared to 10 healthy controls. The mean CSF GFAP concentration of the controls was 60.6 +/- 54 ng/l (SD). The group of 24 subjects (12 boys and 12 girls) with progressive neurologic disorders had higher mean CSF GFAP levels than the group of 10 subjects (5 boys and 5 girls) with non-progressive disorders, 222.6 +/- 186 and 127.5 +/- 86 ng/l, respectively. The progressive encephalopathies differed significantly from controls (p < 0.01) while the non-progressive did not. The mean GFAP concentration of the epilepsy cases (n = 18) and non-epilepsy cases (n = 16) was 212.9 +/- 196 and 174.0 +/- 132 ng/l, respectively. The epilepsy cases differed significantly from controls which could be explained by the dominance of progressive cases (15 out of 18).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Для цитирования: Ehlers S, Kyllerman M, Rosengren L. Analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein in the cerebrospinal fluid of children investigated for encephalopathy.. Neuropediatrics. 1994. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071599.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.