MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi · 2007

[Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty as adjunctive treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma patients].

Saito Yoshiaki, Higashide Tomomi, Sugiyama Kazuhisa

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We retrospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effects of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as adjunctive treatment for glaucoma patients receiving maximal medical therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-four eyes of 34 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma who had no prior surgical therapy and has received SLT for the first time were included in this study. The results of their laser treatment were analyzed retrospectively. The age of patients was 61.1 +/- 13.0 (mean +/- standard deviation) years, the follow-up period was 7.1 +/- 4.8 months, and the number of medications before SLT was 3.5 +/- 0.7. A total of 57.0 +/- 11.5 spots were placed over 180 degrees of the trabecular meshwork at energy levels ranging from 0.5 to 1.4 mJ per pulse.

RESULTS

The IOP significantly decreased from 20.9 +/- 3.4 mmHg at baseline to 18.7 +/- 4.6 mmHg at 1 month after SLT (p < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that success rates at 6 and 12 months after SLT were 48.6% and 23.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SLT significantly decreas ed the IOPs in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma receiving maximal medical therapy, the effects may be for a limited time only, as adjunctive treatment.

Для цитирования: Saito Yoshiaki, Higashide Tomomi, Sugiyama Kazuhisa. [Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty as adjunctive treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma patients].. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.