Journal of pediatric surgery · 2019
Trends in the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in general pediatric surgery: Are we missing the mark for both stewardship and infection prevention?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anandalwar Seema P, Milliren Carly, Graham Dionne A, Hills-Dunlap Jonathan L, Kashtan Mark A, Newland Jason, Rangel Shawn J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess compliance with antimicrobial spectrum guidelines in the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) in pediatric surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children undergoing elective clean-contaminated and clean surgical procedures with foreign body implantation using the Pediatric Health Information System database (10/2015-6/2018) was performed. Compliance rates with consensus guidelines surrounding appropriate spectrum of SAP coverage were calculated for each procedure. Undertreatment was defined as the use of SAP with inappropriately narrow coverage (or omission altogether), while overtreatment was defined as inappropriately broad coverage.
RESULTS: Eight procedure groups including a total of 15,708 patients were included. Overall, 44% of cases received inappropriate prophylaxis, of which 58% were considered undertreatment and 42% overtreatment. Procedures with the highest rates of overtreatment included small bowel procedures (77%), colorectal procedures (29%), and hepatobiliary procedures (20%), while the highest rates of undertreatment were associated with placement of tunneled central venous catheters and ports (43%), hepatobiliary procedures (24%), and colorectal procedures (20%).
CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with the recommended spectrum of coverage for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is common in pediatric surgery, with both over and undertreatment being common themes. Improved compliance is needed to optimize both antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention.
TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children undergoing elective clean-contaminated and clean surgical procedures with foreign body implantation using the Pediatric Health Information System database (10/2015-6/2018) was performed. Compliance rates with consensus guidelines surrounding appropriate spectrum of SAP coverage were calculated for each procedure. Undertreatment was defined as the use of SAP with inappropriately narrow coverage (or omission altogether), while overtreatment was defined as inappropriately broad coverage.
RESULTS: Eight procedure groups including a total of 15,708 patients were included. Overall, 44% of cases received inappropriate prophylaxis, of which 58% were considered undertreatment and 42% overtreatment. Procedures with the highest rates of overtreatment included small bowel procedures (77%), colorectal procedures (29%), and hepatobiliary procedures (20%), while the highest rates of undertreatment were associated with placement of tunneled central venous catheters and ports (43%), hepatobiliary procedures (24%), and colorectal procedures (20%).
CONCLUSION: Noncompliance with the recommended spectrum of coverage for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is common in pediatric surgery, with both over and undertreatment being common themes. Improved compliance is needed to optimize both antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention.
TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.