MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000600003

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2010

Myasthenia gravis in Ceará, Brazil: clinical and epidemiological aspects.

Aguiar Aline de Almeida Xavier, Carvalho André Ferrer, Costa Carlos Mauricio de Castro, Fernandes José Marcelino Aragão, D'Almeida José Artur Costa, Furtado Luís Edmundo Teixeira de Arruda, Cunha Francisco Marcos Bezerra da

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients diagnosed as having myasthenia gravis in Ceará State, Brazil and who were followed from October 1981 to June 2009. Clinical and epidemiologic aspects were evaluated. In this work, 122 patients were studied, of whom 85 (69.7%) were females and 37 (30.3%) were males. The disease duration ranged from five months to 50 years (8.9±8.1 years). Age at the first symptoms varied from 0 to 74 years (31.9±14.4 years). The first main symptoms and signs were ptosis, diplopia and limb weakness. Generalized myasthenia was the most common clinical presentation, but 5.1% (n=6) persisted as ocular myasthenia. Thymectomy was performed in 42.6% (n=52) of myasthenic patients. A thymoma was present in 10 patients. Serum acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies were present in 80% (n=20) of specimens tested. The data presented are similar to those of studies performed in other countries.

Для цитирования: Aguiar Aline de Almeida Xavier, Carvalho André Ferrer, Costa Carlos Mauricio de Castro, Fernandes José Marcelino Aragão, D'Almeida José Artur Costa, Furtado Luís Edmundo Teixeira de Arruda, Cunha Francisco Marcos Bezerra da. Myasthenia gravis in Ceará, Brazil: clinical and epidemiological aspects.. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2010. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000600003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.