Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2020
Pretreatment HIV drug resistance predicts accumulation of new mutations in ART-naïve Ugandan children.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soeria-Atmadja Sandra, Amuge Pauline, Nanzigu Sarah, Bbuye Dickson, Rubin Johanna, Eriksen Jaran, Kekitiinwa Adeodata, Obua Celestino, Gustafsson Lars L, Navér Lars
Аннотация
AIM: To assess the prevalence of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) and its association with virologic outcomes after 24 weeks of antiretroviral therapy (ART), within an urban cohort of Ugandan children.
METHODS: Prospective observational study. Baseline and 24-week assessments of viral load (VL) and genotypic drug resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) were performed.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine ART-naïve children (3-12 years) initiated efavirenz-based ART 2015-2016 and 18/90 (20%) had baseline NRTI/NNRTI associated drug resistance mutations (DRMs). By 24 weeks, 72/93 (77%) children had VL < 40 copies/mL and a total of 23 children had DRMs. Children with PDR accumulated new DRMs with a mean number (SD) of 1.4 (2.35) new mutations compared to 0.26 (0.98) in 67 children with wild-type virus (P = .003). High pretreatment VL and PDR (number of baseline DRMs) predicted viremia (P = .003; P = .023) as well as acquired drug resistance (P = .02; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment drug resistance to NNRTI/NRTI was common among ART-naïve Ugandan children and predicted viremia and new resistance mutations after only 24 weeks of efavirenz-based therapy. PDR may compromise long-term ART outcomes-especially when access to resistance testing and VL monitoring is poor. The long-term importance of PDR for non-NNRTI-based regimens needs further evaluation.
METHODS: Prospective observational study. Baseline and 24-week assessments of viral load (VL) and genotypic drug resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) were performed.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine ART-naïve children (3-12 years) initiated efavirenz-based ART 2015-2016 and 18/90 (20%) had baseline NRTI/NNRTI associated drug resistance mutations (DRMs). By 24 weeks, 72/93 (77%) children had VL < 40 copies/mL and a total of 23 children had DRMs. Children with PDR accumulated new DRMs with a mean number (SD) of 1.4 (2.35) new mutations compared to 0.26 (0.98) in 67 children with wild-type virus (P = .003). High pretreatment VL and PDR (number of baseline DRMs) predicted viremia (P = .003; P = .023) as well as acquired drug resistance (P = .02; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment drug resistance to NNRTI/NRTI was common among ART-naïve Ugandan children and predicted viremia and new resistance mutations after only 24 weeks of efavirenz-based therapy. PDR may compromise long-term ART outcomes-especially when access to resistance testing and VL monitoring is poor. The long-term importance of PDR for non-NNRTI-based regimens needs further evaluation.