68Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi as a Versatile Diagnostic Probe for Various Epithelial Malignancies: A Head-to-Head Comparison with 18F-FDG.

RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES

Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts has been a major breakthrough causing a paradigm shift in targeted theranostics focusing on the tumor microenvironment. In this study, a squaric acid derivative DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi) has been evaluated as a potential diagnostic probe in diverse epithelial cancers and compared to the standard-of-care 18F-FDG.

METHODS

25 patients enrolled in this prospective study underwent 18F-FDG and 68Ga-SA.FAPi PET scans on two different days. For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using SUVs corrected for lean body mass (SUL), SUVmax, tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) with liver and blood pool as the reference, total lesion glycolysis (TLG for 18F-FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for 68Ga-SA.FAPi).

RESULTS

25 patients (mean age: 58 ± 8 years) with four types of cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 56% of cohort), gall bladder carcinoma (GB Ca, 12%), adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC, 16%), and breast carcinoma (breast Ca, 16%) were prospectively evaluated. Physiological tracer uptake of 68Ga-SA.FAPi was noted in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles and kidneys with variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa and uterus. Lesion-based comparative analysis between both the radiotracers demonstrated complete concordant findings in detection of all primary lesions and distant metastases in liver, bones, adrenals and peritoneum whereas discordant findings were noted in lung nodules (20%) and lymph nodes (13%). In overall analysis, 68Ga-SA.FAPi exhibited significantly higher SUVmax (10.3 vs 8.8, p-0.019), SULpeak (6.8 vs 4.9, p-0.000) and SULavg (5.4 vs 4.1, p-0.019) in comparison to 18F-FDG whereas TBR was comparable for both the tracers [TBRLiver: median 1.9 (IQR: 2.6-1.4) vs 1.8 (2.6-1.1), p-0.275; TBRBloodpool: 2.1 (3.7-1.4) vs 2.0 (2.7-1.4), p-0.207]. In subcategorical analysis, 68Ga-SA.FAPi demonstrated higher SUVmax, SULpeak and SULavg values for primary disease (SUVmax: 14.8 (18.7-9.7) vs (12.9-6.6), p-0.087; SULpeak: 8.2 (11.2-6.8) vs 6.3 (8.5-4.4), p-0.037; SULavg: 6.9 ± 2.5 vs 5.1 ± 2.2, p-0.023] and distant metastases (8.8 vs 7.2, p-0.038); 6.3 (8.8-4.4) vs 3.6 (4.4-2.0), p-0.000; 5.4 vs 3.5, p-0.000] whereas comparable values were noted for both the tracers in nodal metastases [9 (13.5-4.1) vs 8 (12.7-4.7), p-0.726; 4.5 (6.2-1.8) vs 4.3 (5.7-2.2), p-0.727; 4.1 ± 2.3 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, p-0.129]. In primary disease, highest 68Ga-SA.FAPi avidity was noted in ACC followed by GB Ca and HCC. In distant metastases, gall bladder, lung and skeletal lesions demonstrated higher 68Ga-SA.FAPi avidity. Moreover, 68Ga-SA.FAPi identified five additional lung lesions which were missed by 18F-FDG in one case of ACC.

CONCLUSION

68Ga-SA.FAPi emerged as an effective, versatile diagnostic probe for imaging various epithelial malignancies similar to 18F-FDG.