The neuroradiology journal · 2026
Patterns of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement in patients with high-grade glioma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sahu Arpita, Mehta Daksh, Dasgupta Archya, Dev Indraja, Puranik Ameya, Bhattacharya Kajari, Sahay Ayushi, Sridhar Epari, Shetty Prakash, Moiyadi Aliasgar, Menon Nandini, Chatterjee Abhishek, Gupta Tejpal
Аннотация
Background and purposeInterpretation of imaging findings after radiation can be challenging in patients with high-grade glioma. Appearance of contrast-enhancing lesions during follow-up imaging poses difficulty in differentiating true progression from treatment-related changes. In the current study, we report patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement.Materials and methodsPatients with histopathological diagnosis of HGG developing radiation-induced contrast enhancement in the subependymal region were considered in the retrospective study. The subependymal enhancement was required to be in the high-dose region of radiotherapy. Patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which included T1-contrast, T2-weighted, perfusion, and spectroscopy. Confirmation of radiation changes rather than disease progression was decided based on regression or stability of concerned findings on follow-up imaging.ResultsThirty-four patients were included in the analysis. The median time from radiotherapy to onset of subependymal enhancement was 15 months. The enhancement pattern was feathery, nodular, and linear in 53%, 35%, and 3% of patients, respectively. A T2-hyperintense signal with a hypointense rim was seen in 74% of patients. Majority of these lesions were isoperfused (26%) or hypoperfused (47%). The median radiological follow-up after onset of subependymal enhancement was 7 months (range 1-61 months). At final follow-up, complete resolution, partial regression, and stable findings of the concerned enhancement were seen in 18%, 38%, and 44%, respectively.ConclusionSubependymal enhancement can be seen following radiation, which should be considered during the evaluation of follow-up imaging. Multiparametric MRI with specific contrast patterns, T2-weighted findings, and perfusion imaging can help identify radiation-induced enhancement.