m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Endoscopy · 2025

The value of routine endoscopic ultrasound in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Gangaram Panday Sanjiv S G, Pittacolo Matteo, Lagarde Sjoerd M, Mostert Bianca, Honing Judith, van Lanschot J Jan B, Bisseling Tanya M, Schoon Erik J, van Dieren Jolanda M, Quispel Rutger, Oostenbrug Liekele E, van der Linden Andries, Corporaal Sietske, Hol Lieke, Kouw Eva, Boonstra Jurjen J, Hazen Wouter L, Vegt Erik, Spaander Manon C W, Wijnhoven Bas P L, SANO Study Group*

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) involves repeated diagnostic tests to detect cancer regrowth. In the SANO trial, this included esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsies, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious lymph nodes, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT). The value of routine EUS in this setting remains largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of EUS over PET-CT.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by clinical response evaluations with EGD, EUS, and PET-CT was performed. Initial response assessment was performed within 3 months post-nCRT. Patients without tumor regrowth underwent active surveillance with repeated diagnostic testing. The primary outcome was the rate of EUS-detected lymph node metastases missed by PET-CT, after excluding cases with positive EGD findings or distant metastases.

RESULTS: 327 patients underwent both PET-CT and EUS post-nCRT, accounting for 1006 combined procedures: 327 at initial response assessment; 679 during active surveillance (6-60 months post-nCRT) in 121 patients. Positive lymph nodes were detected by EUS in 3.7% (12/327) of initial response assessments, with 2.1% (7/327) unidentified by PET-CT. During surveillance, this dropped to 0.9% of assessments (6/679), with 0.1% (1/679) missed by PET-CT.

CONCLUSIONS: EUS with FNA adds most value at 3 months post-nCRT, when the likelihood of detecting recurrence is highest. Beyond 3 months, its added value is limited (0.1% with negative PET-CT). Restricting the use of EUS to PET-suspicious nodes could omit 98% of EUS procedures.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты