Heart rhythm · 2014
Predictors of myocardial recovery in pediatric tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moore Jeremy P, Patel Payal A, Shannon Kevin M, Albers Erin L, Salerno Jack C, Stein Maya A, Stephenson Elizabeth A, Mohan Shaun, Shah Maully J, Asakai Hiroko, Pflaumer Andreas, Czosek Richard J, Everitt Melanie D, Garnreiter Jason M, McCanta Anthony C, Papez Andrew L, Escudero Carolina, Sanatani Shubhayan, Cain Nicole B, Kannankeril Prince J, Bratincsak Andras, Mandapati Ravi, Silva Jennifer N A, Knecht Kenneth R, Balaji Seshadri
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality, although full recovery is possible. Little is known about the myocardial recovery pattern.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the time course and predictors of myocardial recovery in pediatric TIC.
METHODS: An international multicenter study of pediatric TIC was conducted. Children ≤18 years with incessant tachyarrhythmia, cardiac dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%), and left ventricular (LV) dilation (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD] z-score ≥2) were included. Children with congenital heart disease or suspected primary cardiomyopathy were excluded. Primary end-points were time to LV systolic functional recovery (LVEF ≥55%) and normal LV size (LVEDD z-score <2).
RESULTS: Eighty-one children from 17 centers met inclusion criteria: median age 4.0 years (range 0.0-17.5 years) and baseline LVEF 28% (interquartile range 19-39). The most common arrhythmias were ectopic atrial tachycardia (59%), permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (23%), and ventricular tachycardia (7%). Thirteen required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 11) or ventricular assist device (n = 2) support. Median time to recovery was 51 days for LVEF and 71 days for LVEDD. Two (4%) underwent heart transplantation, and 1 died (1%). Multivariate predictors of LV systolic functional recovery were age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, P = .040), standardized tachycardia rate (HR 1.16, P = .015), mechanical circulatory support (HR 2.61, P = .044), and LVEF (HR 1.33 per 10% increase, p=0.005). For normalization of LV size, only baseline LVEDD (HR 0.86, P = .008) was predictive.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric TIC resolves in a predictable fashion. Factors associated with faster recovery include younger age, higher presenting heart rate, use of mechanical circulatory support, and higher LVEF, whereas only smaller baseline LV size predicts reverse remodeling. This knowledge may be useful for clinical evaluation and follow-up of affected children.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the time course and predictors of myocardial recovery in pediatric TIC.
METHODS: An international multicenter study of pediatric TIC was conducted. Children ≤18 years with incessant tachyarrhythmia, cardiac dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%), and left ventricular (LV) dilation (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD] z-score ≥2) were included. Children with congenital heart disease or suspected primary cardiomyopathy were excluded. Primary end-points were time to LV systolic functional recovery (LVEF ≥55%) and normal LV size (LVEDD z-score <2).
RESULTS: Eighty-one children from 17 centers met inclusion criteria: median age 4.0 years (range 0.0-17.5 years) and baseline LVEF 28% (interquartile range 19-39). The most common arrhythmias were ectopic atrial tachycardia (59%), permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (23%), and ventricular tachycardia (7%). Thirteen required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 11) or ventricular assist device (n = 2) support. Median time to recovery was 51 days for LVEF and 71 days for LVEDD. Two (4%) underwent heart transplantation, and 1 died (1%). Multivariate predictors of LV systolic functional recovery were age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, P = .040), standardized tachycardia rate (HR 1.16, P = .015), mechanical circulatory support (HR 2.61, P = .044), and LVEF (HR 1.33 per 10% increase, p=0.005). For normalization of LV size, only baseline LVEDD (HR 0.86, P = .008) was predictive.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric TIC resolves in a predictable fashion. Factors associated with faster recovery include younger age, higher presenting heart rate, use of mechanical circulatory support, and higher LVEF, whereas only smaller baseline LV size predicts reverse remodeling. This knowledge may be useful for clinical evaluation and follow-up of affected children.