Clinical outcomes of persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical outcomes of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in patients with cardioembolic stroke caused by nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) because the nature of the fibrillation can cause persistent cerebral infarction.

METHODS

We classified 619 of 964 patients hospitalized with cardioembolic stroke between April 2007 and December 2013 within 24 hours of onset as having PeAF (n = 447) and PAF (n = 172) according to a retrospective analysis of their clinical records, including National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission, clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores) at 90 days after admission, and major cerebral artery occlusion.

RESULTS

The PeAF group was significantly older (P < .001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (P = .007), diabetes (P = .039), heart failure (P = .004), previous coronary artery disease (P = .002) and cerebral infarction (P < .001), medication with anticoagulants (P < .001), and elevated blood glucose on admission (P = .002). Neurologic severity assessed by NIHSS scores on admission was significantly worse in the PeAF than in the PAF group (P < .001). Significantly more patients in the PAF group had favorable outcomes (mRS, 0-2) after 90 days (P < .001). The incidence of major cerebral artery occlusion was significantly higher in the PeAF group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PeAF and cardioembolic stroke due to NVAF had more severe neurologic deficits on admission, more frequent major arterial occlusion, and poorer outcomes than those with PAF.