Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 1997
Comparison of two dosing regimens of cisapride in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schütze K, Bigard M A, Van Waes L, Hinojosa J, Bedogni G, Hentschel E
Аннотация
AIM: In an international, multicentre, double-blind trial, to document the therapeutic equivalence of two dosing regimens of cisapride on endoscopic healing and symptom improvement in patients with proven reflux oesophagitis grade I or II (Savary-Miller).
METHODS: Four hundred and seven patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either cisapride 10 mg q.d.s. or cisapride 20 mg b.d. for 8-12 weeks depending on whether complete healing was found at endoscopy. The primary parameters of efficacy were cure of oesphagitis and improvement of the reflux symptom score.
RESULTS: The healing rates at endpoint were 73% in both treatment groups. The mean total reflux symptom score decreased from baseline to endpoint from 7.9-2.1 (cisapride 10 mg q.d.s) and 7.9-2.5 (cisapride 20 mg b.d.). Each of the two treatment regimens was well tolerated. The most frequently (6.9%) reported adverse event (diarrhoea) was mild or moderate in most cases and can be explained by pharmacological action of cisapride.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that cisapride 10 mg q.d.s. and 20 mg b.d. are equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.
METHODS: Four hundred and seven patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either cisapride 10 mg q.d.s. or cisapride 20 mg b.d. for 8-12 weeks depending on whether complete healing was found at endoscopy. The primary parameters of efficacy were cure of oesphagitis and improvement of the reflux symptom score.
RESULTS: The healing rates at endpoint were 73% in both treatment groups. The mean total reflux symptom score decreased from baseline to endpoint from 7.9-2.1 (cisapride 10 mg q.d.s) and 7.9-2.5 (cisapride 20 mg b.d.). Each of the two treatment regimens was well tolerated. The most frequently (6.9%) reported adverse event (diarrhoea) was mild or moderate in most cases and can be explained by pharmacological action of cisapride.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate that cisapride 10 mg q.d.s. and 20 mg b.d. are equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.