MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1142/s242483552450005x

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume · 2024

Prospective Analysis of Simulated Pneumatic Tourniquet Use and Oedema Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

Wu Edward J, Lai Cara H, Muraoka Kunihide, Segovia Nicole, Kleimeyer John P, Yao Jeffrey

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background

Tourniquet use during upper extremity surgery in patients with a history of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial due to the perceived but unproven risk of lymphoedema. We prospectively evaluated upper extremity swelling in patients with a history of unilateral ALND using a standardised tourniquet model.

Methods

A tourniquet was applied to the upper arm bilaterally, with the unaffected side serving as an internal control. Each arm was subsequently held in an elevated position to reduce swelling. Hand volume was measured using an aqueous volumeter.

Results

The patients' ALND arms experienced slightly greater increases in volume following tourniquet application compared to their healthy control arms. However, this amount of oedema was temporary and reversible, as both arms experienced spontaneous resolution of swelling with no significant difference in residual hand volume at the conclusion of the study.

Conclusions

Tourniquet use may be safe in patients with a history of ALND. Further investigation is needed to verify this in a surgical setting. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic).

Для цитирования: Wu Edward J, Lai Cara H, Muraoka Kunihide, Segovia Nicole, Kleimeyer John P, Yao Jeffrey. Prospective Analysis of Simulated Pneumatic Tourniquet Use and Oedema Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.. The journal of hand surgery Asian-Pacific volume. 2024. DOI: 10.1142/s242483552450005x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.