Journal of pediatric psychology · 2015
Validation of the Abdominal Pain Index using a revised scoring method.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laird Kelsey T, Sherman Amanda L, Smith Craig A, Walker Lynn S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the psychometric properties of child- and parent-report versions of the four-item Abdominal Pain Index (API) in children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) and healthy controls, using a revised scoring method that facilitates comparisons of scores across samples and time.
METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 8-18 years with FAP and controls completed the API at baseline (N = 1,967); a subset of their parents (N = 290) completed the API regarding the child's pain. Subsets of patients completed follow-up assessments at 2 weeks (N = 231), 3 months (N = 330), and 6 months (N = 107). Subsets of both patients (N = 389) and healthy controls (N = 172) completed a long-term follow-up assessment (mean age at follow-up = 20.21 years, SD = 3.75).
RESULTS: The API demonstrated good concurrent, discriminant, and construct validity, as well as good internal consistency.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the API, using the revised scoring method, is a useful, reliable, and valid measure of abdominal pain severity.
METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 8-18 years with FAP and controls completed the API at baseline (N = 1,967); a subset of their parents (N = 290) completed the API regarding the child's pain. Subsets of patients completed follow-up assessments at 2 weeks (N = 231), 3 months (N = 330), and 6 months (N = 107). Subsets of both patients (N = 389) and healthy controls (N = 172) completed a long-term follow-up assessment (mean age at follow-up = 20.21 years, SD = 3.75).
RESULTS: The API demonstrated good concurrent, discriminant, and construct validity, as well as good internal consistency.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the API, using the revised scoring method, is a useful, reliable, and valid measure of abdominal pain severity.