Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2023
Radioactive versus normal stent insertion for malignant hilar obstruction: a meta-analysis.
МетаанализСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Zhong-Ke, Li Dong-Lu, Du Jun-Jun, She Jia-Xiang, Meng Jiao, Fan Jing
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis was designed for examining the relative clinical safety and efficacy of normal stent (NS) and radioactive stent (RS) insertion in malignant hilar obstruction (MHO) patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant studies published as of March 2022 were identified through searches of the Medline, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI databases, and the pooled results of these studies were then analyzed.
RESULTS: Eight studies including 258 and 247 patients that underwent NS and RS insertion, respectively, were incorporated into this meta-analysis. RS insertion was found to be associated with significant improvements in functional successful rate (p = 0.04), Δaspertate aminotransferase (AST, p = 0.0004), Δalanine aminotransferase (ALT, p = 0.002), stent patency (p < 0.00001), stent re-obstruction rate (p = 0.03), and OS (p < 0.00001) outcomes as compared to those associated with NS insertion. No differences in Δtotal bilirubin (TBIL, p = 0.38), cholangeitis rate (p = 0.45), cholecystitis rate (p = 0.84), or hemorrhage rate (p = 0.87) were observed when comparing patients that underwent RS and NS insertion. Substantial publication bias was observed for endpoints of cholecystitis and hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that relative to NS insertion, RS insertion can effectively prolong stent patency and OS in MHO cases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant studies published as of March 2022 were identified through searches of the Medline, Embase, Wanfang, and CNKI databases, and the pooled results of these studies were then analyzed.
RESULTS: Eight studies including 258 and 247 patients that underwent NS and RS insertion, respectively, were incorporated into this meta-analysis. RS insertion was found to be associated with significant improvements in functional successful rate (p = 0.04), Δaspertate aminotransferase (AST, p = 0.0004), Δalanine aminotransferase (ALT, p = 0.002), stent patency (p < 0.00001), stent re-obstruction rate (p = 0.03), and OS (p < 0.00001) outcomes as compared to those associated with NS insertion. No differences in Δtotal bilirubin (TBIL, p = 0.38), cholangeitis rate (p = 0.45), cholecystitis rate (p = 0.84), or hemorrhage rate (p = 0.87) were observed when comparing patients that underwent RS and NS insertion. Substantial publication bias was observed for endpoints of cholecystitis and hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that relative to NS insertion, RS insertion can effectively prolong stent patency and OS in MHO cases.