MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13104-016-1934-5

Медицинская библиотека · BMC research notes · 2016

Maxillofacial fractures among Sudanese children at Khartoum Dental Teaching Hospital.

Almahdi Hatim M, Higzi Mohammed A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Maxillofacial fractures in children are less frequent compared to adults but result in special complications affecting the growth, function and esthetics.

AIM: The study aimed at assessing the characteristics and the pattern of facial fractures among children seen at Khartoum Teaching Dental Hospital (KTDH).

METHOD: The study included 390 patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma at KTDH during a year period (2010-2011).

RESULTS

A total of 390 patients, diagnosed with facial fractures, were seen at KTDH; 14.1% (55) were children below 16 years of age with the mean age of 10 years (SD ± 3.9). The ratio of males to females was 2.2:1. Most fractures were due to road traffic accidents (RTA) 56.4%, followed by daily living activities 21.8% and assault 16.4%. The most prevalent anatomic sites of fractures were mandible 77%; combination fractures i.e. more than one site 32.7% and zygomatic-complex (13.5%). Concomitant injuries were found in 9.1%. Almost half of the patients were managed conservatively 49.1%, closed reduction 34.5% and surgical open reduction 16.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicated that pediatric facial fractures constitute 14.1% of the total number of facial fractures. RTA was the main cause, which should be considered in legislative and preventive strategies.

Для цитирования: Almahdi Hatim M, Higzi Mohammed A. Maxillofacial fractures among Sudanese children at Khartoum Dental Teaching Hospital.. BMC research notes. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-1934-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.