MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ico.0b013e3181c29705

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2010

Extended long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Fukuoka Shima, Honda Norihiko, Ono Kyoko, Mimura Tatsuya, Usui Tomohiko, Amano Shiro

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate the extended long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus.

METHODS

The subjects were all patients with clinical keratoconus who underwent initial PK at University of Tokyo from 1971 to 1990 and whose medical records were available. Data were retrieved from the medical records. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative probability of immune reaction-free grafts and graft survival.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five eyes in 125 patients met the entry criteria. The average age at the time of PK was 25.0 +/- 8.9 years. With an average follow-up period of 15.3 +/- 9.7 years, 12 eyes (9.6%) experienced rejection and 5 eyes (4.0%) experienced graft failure. Average best-corrected visual acuity in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at preoperation, 10, 20, and 25 years after surgery was 1.54 +/- 0.68, 0.06 +/- 0.22, 0.03 +/- 0.17, and 0.14 +/- 0.42, respectively. The cumulative probability of graft survival at 10, 20, and 25 years after PK was 98.8%, 97.0%, and 93.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery of visual acuity was good after PK for keratoconus in an extended follow-up. The graft survival rate, however, gradually decreased 20 years after PK.

Для цитирования: Fukuoka Shima, Honda Norihiko, Ono Kyoko, Mimura Tatsuya, Usui Tomohiko, Amano Shiro. Extended long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.. Cornea. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e3181c29705.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.