Journal of glaucoma · 2006
An evaluation of the rate of nonresponders to latanoprost therapy.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rossetti Luca, Gandolfi Stefano, Traverso Carlo, Montanari Paolo, Uva Maurizio, Manni Gianluca, Carassa Roberto, Mastropasqua Leonardo, Quaranta Luciano, Marchini Giorgio, Ratiglia Roberto, Orzalesi Nicola
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the proportion of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OH) who do not respond to latanoprost therapy.
METHODS: Three hundred forty consecutive patients with a new diagnosis of POAG or OH, or previously treated only with a beta-blocker and after an appropriate washout period, were treated with latanoprost for 1 month and then divided into three groups on the basis of the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP): nonresponders (<15%), responders (> or =15% but <30%), and high-responders (> or =30%). To give a wide picture of the drug effect, eight different cut-off points were used to present data on distribution of mean IOP reductions. Only the nonresponders entered a randomized cross-over study investigating the efficacy of timolol, brimonidine, and pilocarpine.
RESULTS: IOP at baseline and after 1 month's latanoprost therapy was respectively 24.1+/-1.4 and 16.9+/-2.4 mm Hg, with a mean reduction in IOP of 29.9+/-4.2%. Nonresponders accounted for 4.1% of the patients and high-responders for 41.2%. The nonresponders showed a statistically significant reduction in IOP after brimonidine treatment (P=0.05), whereas the reduction after timolol and pilocarpine treatment was clinically relevant but not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter prospective study found only 14 of 340 nonresponders to latanoprost. In the cross-over trial on nonresponders, IOP reduction reached statistical significance only after brimonidine, but their small number reduced its statistical power.
METHODS: Three hundred forty consecutive patients with a new diagnosis of POAG or OH, or previously treated only with a beta-blocker and after an appropriate washout period, were treated with latanoprost for 1 month and then divided into three groups on the basis of the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP): nonresponders (<15%), responders (> or =15% but <30%), and high-responders (> or =30%). To give a wide picture of the drug effect, eight different cut-off points were used to present data on distribution of mean IOP reductions. Only the nonresponders entered a randomized cross-over study investigating the efficacy of timolol, brimonidine, and pilocarpine.
RESULTS: IOP at baseline and after 1 month's latanoprost therapy was respectively 24.1+/-1.4 and 16.9+/-2.4 mm Hg, with a mean reduction in IOP of 29.9+/-4.2%. Nonresponders accounted for 4.1% of the patients and high-responders for 41.2%. The nonresponders showed a statistically significant reduction in IOP after brimonidine treatment (P=0.05), whereas the reduction after timolol and pilocarpine treatment was clinically relevant but not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter prospective study found only 14 of 340 nonresponders to latanoprost. In the cross-over trial on nonresponders, IOP reduction reached statistical significance only after brimonidine, but their small number reduced its statistical power.