Stroke · 2001
Power transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
White P M, Wardlaw J M, Teasdale E, Sloss S, Cannon J, Easton V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to perform a large, prospective, multicenter, blinded study comparing power transcranial color duplex sonography (power TCDS) with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
METHODS: Contemporaneous TCDS and IADSA examinations were performed in 171 subjects with suspected intracranial aneurysm. Via the temporal bone window, a 2-dimensional hand-held noncontrast transcranial duplex ultrasound imaging system was used operating in power and spectral modes. Sonographers were blinded to clinical history and results of brain CT and IADSA.
RESULTS: We found that 157 subjects (92%) had an adequate bone window. Sensitivity per patient was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.87) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.56) for any anterior circulation aneurysms. Sensitivity was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.46) for aneurysms </=5 mm and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.94) for aneurysms >5 mm. Accuracy was lower for aneurysms on the cavernous and terminal internal carotid arteries, including posterior communicating artery origin (0.71; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.79), than for those on the anterior (0.82; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.89) or the middle cerebral arteries (0.79; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: Power TCDS is a promising, inexpensive, noninvasive test for anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms but is less sensitive per aneurysm than alternatives such as CT angiography or MR angiography. Sensitivity is poor for aneurysms </=5 mm in diameter. The internal carotid artery is the most difficult segment to interpret.
METHODS: Contemporaneous TCDS and IADSA examinations were performed in 171 subjects with suspected intracranial aneurysm. Via the temporal bone window, a 2-dimensional hand-held noncontrast transcranial duplex ultrasound imaging system was used operating in power and spectral modes. Sonographers were blinded to clinical history and results of brain CT and IADSA.
RESULTS: We found that 157 subjects (92%) had an adequate bone window. Sensitivity per patient was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.87) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.56) for any anterior circulation aneurysms. Sensitivity was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.46) for aneurysms </=5 mm and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.94) for aneurysms >5 mm. Accuracy was lower for aneurysms on the cavernous and terminal internal carotid arteries, including posterior communicating artery origin (0.71; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.79), than for those on the anterior (0.82; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.89) or the middle cerebral arteries (0.79; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.86).
CONCLUSIONS: Power TCDS is a promising, inexpensive, noninvasive test for anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms but is less sensitive per aneurysm than alternatives such as CT angiography or MR angiography. Sensitivity is poor for aneurysms </=5 mm in diameter. The internal carotid artery is the most difficult segment to interpret.