Apathy in Alzheimer's disease: Eye movements characteristics and neurostructural basis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
We sought to evaluate the characteristics of eye movements in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with apathy (AD-A) and their ability to identify AD-A and explore the shared neurostructure of eye movements and apathy.
METHODS
Total 32 normal controls, 36 AD-A, and 72 AD with no apathy (AD-NA) patients were recruited. Parameters of smooth pursuit, fixation, prosaccade, and antisaccade were compared among the three groups. Correlation analyses were conducted among apathy score, eye movement parameters, and gray matter volume (GMV) in AD patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the power of eye movement parameters to identify AD-A group.
RESULTS
AD-A group exhibited a longer start-up duration of smooth pursuit, latencies of gap and overlap prosaccades than AD-NA and normal control groups. In AD patients, apathy score was positively correlated with the latency of overlap prosaccade. The GMV of right pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and left supracallosal ACC were negatively correlated with apathy score. Regions shared by apathy and the latency of overlap prosaccade included right pregenual ACC and left supracallosal ACC. The area under curve discriminated AD-A from AD-NA gropu by combining start-up duration, latencies of gap and overlap prosaccade, and demographic information was 0.812.
CONCLUSIONS
AD-A patients exhibit delayed initiation in eye movements, and the more prominent apathy indicates prolonged latency of overlap prosaccade in AD patients. Apathy and the latency of overlap prosaccade share a neurostructural basis in AD patients. Our results contribute to providing a new method for early identification and severity assessment for AD-A.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.