Outcome of Surgical Management of Glaucoma Following Complex Retinal Detachment Repair With Silicone Oil Tamponade: Drainage Implant Versus Cyclophotocoagulation.

UNLABELLED: PRéCIS:: Glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) are effective for the management of silicone oil-induced glaucoma. Although cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) has the advantage of shorter operative time and repeatability, it carries a higher risk of failure, blindness, and phthisis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the surgical outcome of GDD implantation and diode laser CPC in the management of refractory glaucoma following vitrectomy with silicone oil (SO) injection.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In total, 56 eyes with refractory glaucoma after SO tamponade that underwent either CPC or GDD implantation were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The rates of complete success and qualified success (for IOP between ≥5 and ≤21 mm Hg) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 17 eyes underwent GDD implantation and 39 eyes underwent CPC. The preoperative IOP was 35.7±7.9 mm Hg and 27.8±8.4 mm Hg for the CPC and GDD groups, respectively (P=0.001), with a worse baseline visual acuity (P=0.01) and a higher proportion of SO-filled eyes in the CPC group (P<0.01). The IOP at 1 year postoperatively was 23.5±11.5 mm Hg and 15.3±5.9 mm Hg for the CPC and GDD group, respectively (P=0.01). Both groups achieved a reduction in IOP and number of medications at 1 year (P<0.001). The success rate in the GDD group was 94.1% (16/17), and 53.8% (21/39) in the CPC group at 12 months (P<0.005). Five eyes and 1 eye lost light perception vision in the CPC and GDD groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GDD implantation may carry a higher surgical success rate than CPC. However, CPC retains the advantage of being technically easier and repeatable.