Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
Post-Saccadic Oscillations of the Pupil and Lens Reduce Fixation Stability in Retinitis Pigmentosa and Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guadron Leslie, Titchener Samuel A, Abbott Carla J, Ayton Lauren N, van Opstal A John, Petoe Matthew A, Goossens Jeroen
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Post-saccadic oscillations (PSOs) reflect movements of gaze that result from motion of the pupil and lens relative to the eyeball rather than eyeball rotations. Here, we analyzed the characteristics of PSOs in subjects with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and normal vision (NV). Our aim was to assess the differences in PSOs between people with vision loss and healthy controls because PSOs affect retinal image stability after each saccade.
METHODS: Participants completed a horizontal saccade task and their gaze was measured using a pupil-based eye tracker. Oscillations occurring in the 80 to 200 ms post-saccadic period were described with a damped oscillation model. We compared the amplitude, decay time constant, and frequency of the PSOs for the three different groups. We also examined the correlation between these PSO parameters and the amplitude, peak velocity, and final deceleration of the preceding saccades.
RESULTS: Subjects with vision loss (AMD, n = 6, and RP, n = 5) had larger oscillation amplitudes, longer decay constants, and lower frequencies than subjects with NV (n = 7). The oscillation amplitudes increased with increases in saccade deceleration in all three groups. The other PSO parameters, however, did not show consistent correlations with either saccade amplitude or peak velocity.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-saccadic fixation stability in AMD and RP is reduced due to abnormal PSOs. The differences with respect to NV are not due to differences in saccade kinematics, suggesting that anatomic and neuronal variations affect the suspension of the iris and the lens in the patients' eyes.
METHODS: Participants completed a horizontal saccade task and their gaze was measured using a pupil-based eye tracker. Oscillations occurring in the 80 to 200 ms post-saccadic period were described with a damped oscillation model. We compared the amplitude, decay time constant, and frequency of the PSOs for the three different groups. We also examined the correlation between these PSO parameters and the amplitude, peak velocity, and final deceleration of the preceding saccades.
RESULTS: Subjects with vision loss (AMD, n = 6, and RP, n = 5) had larger oscillation amplitudes, longer decay constants, and lower frequencies than subjects with NV (n = 7). The oscillation amplitudes increased with increases in saccade deceleration in all three groups. The other PSO parameters, however, did not show consistent correlations with either saccade amplitude or peak velocity.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-saccadic fixation stability in AMD and RP is reduced due to abnormal PSOs. The differences with respect to NV are not due to differences in saccade kinematics, suggesting that anatomic and neuronal variations affect the suspension of the iris and the lens in the patients' eyes.