MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.009

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of psychosomatic research · 2007

Neurocognitive changes after carotid revascularization: a review of the current literature.

Berman Loren, Pietrzak Robert H, Mayes Linda

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the current literature evaluating the effect of carotid revascularization on neurocognitive function.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed using the following keywords: carotid surgery, carotid stenosis, cognition, and cognition disorders. Bibliographies were cross referenced and related-articles searches were performed once an article of interest had been identified.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies have been identified from the literature since 1998. Seventeen articles evaluated carotid endarterectomy (CEA), four evaluated carotid stenting, and one compared CEA to stenting. Eight studies found improvements in mood and/or cognition after revascularization, 11 studies showed mixed results, and 3 studies found declines.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus within the current literature as to the effect of carotid revascularization on neurocognitive function. Further research--with attention to laterality of neurocognitive effects, patients' symptomatology at the time of presentation, the role of perioperative embolization, and trial design including adequate control groups and comparison between open surgery and stenting factors--is necessary in order to clarify the effects of carotid revascularization on cognition.

Для цитирования: Berman Loren, Pietrzak Robert H, Mayes Linda. Neurocognitive changes after carotid revascularization: a review of the current literature.. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.