DOI 10.1097/mph.0000000000002758
Top Ten Contributions of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Аннотация
Monumental progress has occurred in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia dating back to the classic paper of Farber and colleagues in 1948. This historical review from the perspective of an individual, familiar with many of the waystations on this superhighway, will offer an admittedly personal review of the top 10 major contributions to the field. Fortunately, there have been many more additional advances beyond these 10 as we have witnessed an impressive improvement in overall survival from a few months 75 years ago to a cure rate of 85% in the world's more advanced countries. Other workers in the field assuredly would create a different list and ranking of these advances but the takeaway summation of the make-up and order of these lists is that advances have yielded improved and prolonged responses, a rational understanding of factors, both clinical and biological, that predict response and prognosis, the application of those factors to tailor therapy's intensity and duration to those factors and to discover and design modalities and targets of therapy that target our much more complete understanding of this most common malignancy of infants and children. On a very personal note, I vividly recall an early, ill-advised decision to devote my academic career to hematology/oncology, with one glaring exception, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and other malignancies. The stark realities of clinical practice and the harsh unmet needs and mostly unanswered challenges redirected my path that resulted in participation in many of these advances, making my own journey so gratifying and that of most of our patients so favorable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.