American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias · 2017
Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yavuz Burcu Balam, Varan Hacer Dogan, O'Caoimh Rónán, Kizilarslanoglu Muhammet Cemal, Kilic Mustafa Kemal, Molloy D William, Dogrul Rana Tuna, Karabulut Erdem, Svendrovski Anton, Sağır Aykut, Cankurtaran Eylem Sahin, Yesil Yusuf, Kuyumcu Mehmet Emin, Halil Meltem, Cankurtaran Mustafa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to validate the Turkish version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q mci-TR) screen.
METHODS: In total, 100 patients aged ≥65 years referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic with memory loss were included. The Q mci was compared to the Turkish versions of the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
RESULTS: The Q mci-TR had higher accuracy than the MoCA in discriminating subjective memory complaints (SMCs) from cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or dementia), of borderline significance after adjusting for age and education ( P = .06). The Q mci-TR also had higher accuracy than the MoCA in differentiating MCI from SMC, which became nonsignificant after adjustment ( P = .15). A similar pattern was shown for distinguishing MCI from dementia. Test reliability for the Q mci-TR was strong.
CONCLUSION: The Q mci-TR is a reliable and useful screening tool for discriminating MCI from SMC and dementia in a Turkish population.
METHODS: In total, 100 patients aged ≥65 years referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic with memory loss were included. The Q mci was compared to the Turkish versions of the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
RESULTS: The Q mci-TR had higher accuracy than the MoCA in discriminating subjective memory complaints (SMCs) from cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or dementia), of borderline significance after adjusting for age and education ( P = .06). The Q mci-TR also had higher accuracy than the MoCA in differentiating MCI from SMC, which became nonsignificant after adjustment ( P = .15). A similar pattern was shown for distinguishing MCI from dementia. Test reliability for the Q mci-TR was strong.
CONCLUSION: The Q mci-TR is a reliable and useful screening tool for discriminating MCI from SMC and dementia in a Turkish population.