MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005706

Медицинская библиотека · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017

Efficacy and safety of available treatments for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil: A multicenter, randomized, open label trial.

Romero Gustavo Adolfo Sierra, Costa Dorcas Lamounier, Costa Carlos Henrique Nery, de Almeida Roque Pacheco, de Melo Enaldo Viera, de Carvalho Sílvio Fernando Guimarães, Rabello Ana, de Carvalho Andréa Lucchesi, Sousa Anastácio de Queiroz, Leite Robério Dias, Lima Simone Soares, Amaral Thais Alves, Alves Fabiana Piovesan, Rode Joelle, Collaborative LVBrasil Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence to support visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment recommendations in Brazil and an urgent need to improve current treatments. Drug combinations may be an option.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, open label, controlled trial was conducted in five sites in Brazil to evaluate efficacy and safety of (i) amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmphoB) (1 mg/kg/day for 14 days), (ii) liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) (3 mg/kg/day for 7 days) and (iii) a combination of LAMB (10 mg/kg single dose) plus meglumine antimoniate (MA) (20 mg Sb+5/kg/day for 10 days), compared to (iv) standard treatment with MA (20 mg Sb+5/kg/day for 20 days). Patients, aged 6 months to 50 years, with confirmed VL and without HIV infection were enrolled in the study. Primary efficacy endpoint was clinical cure at 6 months. A planned efficacy and safety interim analysis led to trial interruption.

RESULTS

378 patients were randomized to the four treatment arms: MA (n = 112), AmphoB (n = 45), LAMB (n = 109), or LAMB plus MA (n = 112). A high toxicity of AmphoB prompted an unplanned interim safety analysis and this treatment arm was dropped. Per intention-to-treat protocol final analyses of the remaining 332 patients show cure rates at 6 months of 77.5% for MA, 87.2% for LAMB, and 83.9% for LAMB plus MA, without statistically significant differences between the experimental arms and comparator (LAMB: 9.7%; CI95% -0.28 to 19.68, p = 0.06; LAMB plus MA: 6.4%; CI95% -3.93 to 16.73; p = 0.222). LAMB monotherapy was safer than MA regarding frequency of treatment-related adverse events (AE) (p = 0.045), proportion of patients presenting at least one severe AE (p = 0.029), and the proportion of AEs resulting in definitive treatment discontinuation (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to lower toxicity and acceptable efficacy, LAMB would be a more suitable first line treatment for VL than standard treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT01310738.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01310738.

Для цитирования: Romero Gustavo Adolfo Sierra, Costa Dorcas Lamounier, Costa Carlos Henrique Nery, de Almeida Roque Pacheco, de Melo Enaldo Viera, de Carvalho Sílvio Fernando Guimarães, Rabello Ana, de Carvalho Andréa Lucchesi, Sousa Anastácio de Queiroz, Leite Robério Dias, Lima Simone Soares, Amaral Thais Alves, Alves Fabiana Piovesan, Rode Joelle, Collaborative LVBrasil Group. Efficacy and safety of available treatments for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil: A multicenter, randomized, open label trial.. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005706.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.