MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01525.x

Медицинская библиотека · Acta ophthalmologica · 2009

Longterm follow-up of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Jensen Lene Bang, Hjortdal Jesper, Ehlers Niels

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe the current visual and refractive status of patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus > 20 years ago and to report on the current status of their grafts.

METHODS

A total of 138 eyes in 103 patients were grafted for keratoconus between August 1968 and December 1985. Patients who had not undergone retransplantation were invited to attend a clinical examination. Forty-eight patients (with 61 grafts) accepted the invitation and were examined.

RESULTS

The average length of time since PK was 26.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 4.2 years, range 20.8-38.0 years, n = 61). The average graft age at examination was 82.1 years (SD 19.9 years, range 41-115 years). A total of 80% (49 of 61 grafts) of the examined eyes had a clear graft and 46% (28 of 61 eyes) had best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) > or = 0.5. The mean endothelial cell density per mm(2) was 894 (SD 4.6, range 470-1775). The mean central corneal thickness of the clear grafts was 0.565 mm (SD 0.048 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus has a good longterm prognosis; half of the eyes examined in this study had BSCVA > or = 0.5 at > 20 years after surgery.

Для цитирования: Jensen Lene Bang, Hjortdal Jesper, Ehlers Niels. Longterm follow-up of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.. Acta ophthalmologica. 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01525.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.