Reworking Classification of First Branchial Cleft Anomalies.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the clinical features of first branchial cleft anomalies (BCAs) and their relationship to pre-operative imaging, pathologic data, and post-operative surveillance outcomes. Additional aims were to assess the validity of the Work classification and describe features of recurrent cysts.
METHODS
Records for 56 children (34 females, 22 males; age at surgery of 5.6 ± 4.4 years) collected over a 12-year period (2009-2021) were reviewed. Imaging and pathologic slides were re-reviewed in a blinded fashion by experts in those respective areas. Parents were contacted via telephone to obtain extended follow-up. An alternate classification method based on the presence (type II) or absence (type I) of parotid involvement is provided.
RESULTS
Only 55% of first BCAs could be successfully classified using Work's method. First BCAs within the parotid were more likely to present with recurrent infections, involve scarred tissue planes and lymphadenopathy, and demonstrate enlarged lymphoid follicles on pathology. The overall recurrence rate was 16%, and recurrence was 5.3 times more likely when external auditory canal cartilage was not resected. Preoperative imaging was useful for predicting the extent of surgery required and the presence of scarred tissue planes.
CONCLUSION
First BCAs within the parotid gland involve more difficult and extensive surgical resection and the potential for morbidity related to facial nerve dissection. Appropriately aggressive surgical resection, which may include the resection of involved ear cartilage, is necessary to prevent morbidity related to recurrence.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:459-465, 2024.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.