MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00383-016-3913-2

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric surgery international · 2016

Primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy for chronic idiopathic constipation.

De La Torre Luis, Cogley Kimberly, Calisto Juan, Nace Gary, Correa Catalina

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To present our experience in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation complicated by megarectosigmoid and fecal incontinence who underwent a primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy.

METHODS

We reviewed eight patients referred to the Colorectal Center from 2014 to 2016 with chronic idiopathic constipation and undergoing a sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy. We analyzed the previous medical treatment, indications for the surgical procedure, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Age at operation was 5-19 years. Time with constipation was 4-15 years. All patients received multiple laxatives, mainly polyethylene glycol, and all had severe social problems. Four patients have autism. The indication for surgery was an unsuccessful laxative trial, refusal to continue with rectal enemas or both, and social fear of continued fecal incontinence. Post-operatively, all patients were having daily bowel movements without fecal accidents.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with chronic idiopathic constipation complicated by megarectosigmoid and fecal incontinence can obtain great benefit from primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy.

Для цитирования: De La Torre Luis, Cogley Kimberly, Calisto Juan, Nace Gary, Correa Catalina. Primary sigmoidectomy and appendicostomy for chronic idiopathic constipation.. Pediatric surgery international. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3913-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.