MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/eat.20422

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of eating disorders · 2007

Should bulimia nervosa be subtyped by history of anorexia nervosa? A longitudinal validation.

Eddy Kamryn T, Dorer David J, Franko Debra L, Tahilani Kavita, Thompson-Brenner Heather, Herzog David B

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a past diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN) predicts longitudinal course and outcome among women with bulimia nervosa (BN).

METHOD: A subset (n = 176) of participants in the Longitudinal Study of Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa who met DSM-IV criteria for BN either at study intake (n = 144) or during follow-up (n = 32; 4 had restricting AN at intake, 28 had binge/purge AN at intake) were included in this report. Over a median of 9 years, weekly eating disorder symptom data were collected from participants using the Longitudinal Interview Follow-up Examination, Eating Disorders Version.

RESULTS

While there were no between-group differences in likelihood of partial recovery, women with BN who had a history of AN were more likely to have a protracted illness, relapsing into AN during follow-up, compared to those with no AN history who were more likely to move from partial to full recovery.

CONCLUSION

Lifetime AN is an important prognostic indicator among women with BN and these longitudinal data would support the subtyping of BN on the basis of AN history.

Для цитирования: Eddy Kamryn T, Dorer David J, Franko Debra L, Tahilani Kavita, Thompson-Brenner Heather, Herzog David B. Should bulimia nervosa be subtyped by history of anorexia nervosa? A longitudinal validation.. The International journal of eating disorders. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/eat.20422.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.