MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/eat.20341

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of eating disorders · 2007

Cross-ethnic differences in eating disorder symptoms and related distress.

Franko Debra L, Becker Anne E, Thomas Jennifer J, Herzog David B

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated ethnic differences in the frequency of eating disorder symptoms and related distress in a U.S. college-based eating disorders screening program.

METHOD: Responses to self-report questions and counselors' assessment were analyzed in an ethnically diverse sample (n = 5,435).

RESULTS

The frequency of binge-eating, restrictive eating, vomiting, and amenorrhea did not differ significantly across ethnic groups. However, significant between-group differences were found with respect to modes of purging. Binge correlates (e.g., eating until uncomfortably full) were significantly more frequent among Caucasian than African American participants (p < .001). Binge eating was the best predictor of distress among Caucasians, African Americans, and Latinos, whereas vomiting was the best predictor of distress among Asians. Asian participants who used laxatives were significantly less likely to receive a recommendation for further evaluation than non-Asian participants.

CONCLUSION

Ethnic diversity in symp tom prevalence and related distress was identified. Clinician recognition of this potential diversity may enhance culturally competent care for eating disorders.

Для цитирования: Franko Debra L, Becker Anne E, Thomas Jennifer J, Herzog David B. Cross-ethnic differences in eating disorder symptoms and related distress.. The International journal of eating disorders. 2007. DOI: 10.1002/eat.20341.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.